
Colossians 2:16–17 is often misunderstood as a blanket dismissal of the seventh-day Sabbath. But a careful reading of the passage—within its Old Testament context and the broader narrative framework of the New Testament—reveals something far more precise. Paul is not abolishing the moral law or the Sabbath established at creation; rather, he is addressing ceremonial observances that pointed forward to Christ, which are no longer binding since Christ has come. To understand Paul rightly, we must not read his words in isolation or project our own assumptions onto the text. Instead, we need to read his letters as part of a continuous biblical narrative, one that flows from the Old Testament, through the Gospels and Acts, and into the epistles.
Paul writes in Colossians 2:16–17, “Therefore do not let anyone judge you with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.” This triadic phrase—festival, new moon, Sabbath—is not something Paul invented. It comes directly from the Old Testament, where it appears repeatedly in reference to Israel’s ceremonial calendar. For example, 2 Chronicles 2:4 speaks of burnt offerings made “on the Sabbaths, the new moons, and the appointed festivals of the Lord.” Ezekiel 45:17 similarly describes offerings provided by the prince “at the festivals, the new moons, and the Sabbaths.” These categories—annual festivals, monthly new moons, and special ceremonial Sabbaths—were all associated with sacrifices and temple rituals.
Understanding this Old Testament background is essential. Paul is using language that his readers—especially those familiar with the Hebrew Scriptures—would recognize. His reference to “Sabbath days” in this context is about ceremonial Sabbaths tied to the sacrificial system, not the weekly Sabbath found in the Ten Commandments and rooted in creation (Genesis 2:2–3). The point Paul is making is not that all days of worship are irrelevant, but that the shadows—those ceremonial observances that pointed forward to Jesus—have found their fulfillment. The reality is Christ, and the shadow no longer has substance.
To make sense of this, we must also place Paul’s words within the broader New Testament story. In Acts 15, the Jerusalem Council settled the question of whether Gentile believers needed to adopt Jewish ceremonial practices to be saved. The answer was no. The apostles agreed that Gentiles were not to be burdened with the yoke of the old covenant law (Acts 15:10). Paul’s letter to the Colossians is an outworking of that decision. He is reminding Gentile believers not to let anyone—particularly Judaizers—judge or disqualify them based on their refusal to adopt these ceremonial shadows (Col. 2:18, 20–21). The Gospel is not a set of regulations; it is a relationship with the risen Christ.
Reading Colossians without this narrative framework leads to distortion. We are tempted to extract verses from letters and read them like isolated theological essays. But the epistles must be read as part of the same story begun in Genesis, revealed through the Gospels, and carried forward in Acts. Acts provides the living history and decisions of the early church. Without Acts, the epistles lose their grounding, and we risk interpreting them based on tradition, assumption, or contemporary preference. This is true not only in Colossians but also in Romans 14, where Paul again addresses disputes over days and diets—issues closely tied to the ceremonial law and the growing pains of a church learning how to integrate Jews and Gentiles.
As John Paulien explains, “The phrase ‘festival, new moon, or Sabbath day’ in Colossians 2:16 is a reference to the Jewish sacred calendar, including its yearly, monthly, and weekly ceremonial observances… not the weekly Sabbath of the Decalogue” (The Deep Things of God, 2004). Similarly, Douglas Moo notes, “The ‘Sabbath’ here is best understood as part of the Jewish festal calendar… not the weekly Sabbath, but rather those Sabbaths tied to particular festivals or seasons” (The Letters to the Colossians and to Philemon, NICNT, 2008).
To rightly interpret Paul, we must read him as part of a larger, unified narrative. The Bible is not a series of disconnected doctrinal points—it is a cohesive story centered on Christ.

Remember
- Paul is addressing ceremonial laws, not the seventh-day Sabbath: The phrase “festival, new moon, or Sabbath day” in Colossians 2:16–17 refers to ceremonial observances tied to sacrifices and temple rituals, not the weekly Sabbath rooted in creation and the Ten Commandments.
- Paul’s language is grounded in the Old Testament: The triadic phrase is drawn from texts like 2 Chronicles 2:4 and Ezekiel 45:17, which describe the sacrificial calendar of Israel. Understanding these Old Testament references is crucial to interpreting Paul accurately.
- Colossians 2 reflects the Acts 15 decision: Paul’s message to the Colossians aligns with the Jerusalem Council’s conclusion that Gentiles were not required to follow Jewish ceremonial laws. He warns them not to let Judaizers pull them back into the old covenant.
- The epistles must be read within the Bible’s unified narrative: Paul’s letters are not stand-alone theological essays. They must be read in light of the Old Testament, the Gospels, and the book of Acts to avoid misinterpretation based on assumptions or traditions.
Don’t Stop Here!
If you want to understand the Bible holistically—even verses like Colossians 2:16–17—get your copy of The Next Step. Building on the foundation of Start Here, this book reveals the deeper patterns and structures in Scripture that make God’s Word clearer and more powerful. Whether you’re just starting or ready to go deeper, The Next Step will transform how you read the Bible—not as isolated texts, but as one cohesive story that draws you closer to God.
Leave a Reply